Validate_User

Much better off investing in someone like Krause if you’ve saved coin for Lane with his Meh stats this year.

TBH, Lane looks severly underwhelming against what else is out there. Pat Pete and Sanders specifically. Going to pass on him this year.

Quote from aaveres >> Thanks for the review OP great info.  My only question is why isn’t Pat Pete CB 2 instead of prime sincein base it’s more likely your opponent will run.  Is prime better in run support than PP You’re welcome 😬 To answer your question, Pat Pete is better in run support that Prime, but Prime is better in coverage. I keep Prime at CB2 until I play someone who is heavy run first. I personally feel the boost in coverage Prime gives outweighs the drop in run support.

Quote from Truly_Elite_CE >> I've been torn over completing the Ramsey diamonds (just need ramsey elite) set or selling off the cards and raising sanders and someone else. Thanks to this post i'll make it Pat Pete and Sanders, as a jags fan that hurts lol thank you.  I wanted to like Ramsey, I really did lol. I feel confident recommending Pat Pete and Sanders though, you won’t be disappointed.

I see Rhodes getting some hate on this, and I anticipated that would happen. To clarify, I have Vikings chem to T9/LD maxed/Sprinter/and Vikings rush defense T4. He’s a monster.

Quote from Kingcash335i >> Surprisingly Champ Bailey always makes a ton of plays for me.  I'll have to try Rhodes out. Right now I have  Deion Sanders, Champ Bailey, Heyward, and Janoris Jenkins maxed out, with Ronnie Lott at FS and Malcom Jenkins at SS both maxed out.   I sold Ramsey the other week figuring that I would buy him back later. He seemed to only really be good for coming over and laying the pipe down on some one after they caught the ball. lol    So I was looking at Patrick Peterson, Marcus Peters and Rhodes.    Maybe I'll try Rhodes next.    Have you tried Marcus Peters yet? I have tried Peters and was mildly impressed, but i wouldn’t put him in the same catagory as Rhodes/Prime/Pat Pete/Ramsey. I personally think he falls with the second tier guys like Champ/Butler. Having said that I did have Peters mixed with Champ and I got a lot more from Champ than Peters.

Quote from spiker311 >> I use both max power up Patrick Peterson and Jalen Ramsey with T6 LD and Peterson makes way more plays in coverage than Ramsey. I don't know what it is. They both stack up pretty close to each other attribute-wise. With that said, I like having big hitter on Ramsey and he has caused some fumbles for me, which is more than I can say for any other CB. I'm going to continue to roll with these two at 1-2. I will miss the Big Hitter and Strips Ball traits, but with T9 Vikings Chem Rhodes is a Monster. If I wasn’t rolling a Vikings squad I would choose Ramsey over Rhodes.

Quote from blaze556 >> been thinking about doing the same. theyre around the same price so I could sell ramsey and get pat pete, get his elite from the level up pack, use the power up pass in place of totw hill and sell that too. I say take the plunge. Another factor is that based on the years they are each having (Not to mention Pat Pete possibly getting traded to a contender) Pat Pete has more upgrades in his future.

Almost forgot,    Not Sucking in Real Life- Pat Pete

Barr on this unless your TE situation is in shambles.