They were on fire for me when they first dropped yesterday. Multiple 88s, 86 spending 8k in training. The next 8k which I did in the evening and some this morning were all 77s and an 83.
I did about 40k worth of rolls last night based on some people saying they got a boss card. Didn’t really believe them tbh. I got about 7-8 86’s, 6-7 83’s and a Justin Herbert!! Couldn’t believe my eyes. I quickly sold it for 640K. I already have one. It can happen. Didn’t think it was real, but they do sprinkle them in.
Edited by asacks14
I did exactly 4 rolls and pulled 2 86’s. Sold for 30k each and called it a day.
Damn….Nikelz is still on this god forsaken site. What a blast from the past.
I think you over performed by a significant degree based on what I’ve seen, but a great run none the less. About 200k returned on a <75k investment.
Hard to beat that, bro. 🤙
Edited by DOT_CALM
Yea i been here since 16 i believe. And yes definitly luck involved
Nah fam, we all know massive money spenders such as yourself have boosted odds. It's been proven as fact.
please explain how this has been proven.
This one is easy and it goes down two different paths. First, in the same way all pack odds are tracked, with a statistically large enough sample size, many people on Twitter will regularly post the odds of pulling cards in rerolls (watch Gutfoxx if you want more info). Using that same methodology, we've tracked point pulls versus coin pulls on identical packs, and it's been statistically proven that point pulls have boosted odds.
If you insist that is BS, random, whatever, I would point you to EA's legal verbiage posted both on there website and within the game regarding computational probability. E.g. "Pack probabilities in Madden are calculated by simulating the opening of a very large number of each pack type in the MUT Store. The number of packs opened in a simulation varies based on the content within those packs, but it will always be enough to be statistically valid. We then re-run this process with every content update."
BUT the key is looking at each pack itself. It deliberately and legally bound itself to using the term "minimum" probabilities, such that increased odds (boosts) could be given to those very same packs purchased with points. They of course aren't going to come out and say this, but it's pretty clear why they made that important distinction.
First thank you for a detailed reply.
Second I never said it was BS just wanted proof.
Third not sure what you posted is actual proof (definitely very close to) but I have my own first hand experience (pulling golden ticket players) and I lean in the direction of yes spenders get better odds.
Spent 5120 so only 8 rolls 88-1 86-1 83-2 79-4 Cant really complain