I would say at this point, if you don't average 91 minimum, it's going to be a struggle. My O-line from left to right is 94-92-93-96-97, and they got abused by someone who had 98 JJ Watt and 97 Joe Greene. I lost the game 3-2.
My team OVR is 94, and if I played all 25 games in WL, I'd probably get about 15 wins. If I lose to someone who has a 91 OVR team or lower, they usually have a ton of the OOP players (HB Vick, TE Clark, LB Bo, etc.) The OOP players are a good example of lower rated players who can fit into many schemes easily because their physical abilities are higher than the typical players at the position that a decent user could exploit. Their OVRs are driven down because they lack position specific skills, but that's negated by usering them. For instance, lower AWR or ZCV of a LB won't really penalize you if you user them.
I would say at this point, if you don't average 91 minimum, it's going to be a struggle. My O-line from left to right is 94-92-93-96-97, and they got abused by someone who had 98 JJ Watt and 97 Joe Greene. I lost the game 3-2.
My team OVR is 94, and if I played all 25 games in WL, I'd probably get about 15 wins. If I lose to someone who has a 91 OVR team or lower, they usually have a ton of the OOP players (HB Vick, TE Clark, LB Bo, etc.) The OOP players are a good example of lower rated players who can fit into many schemes easily because their physical abilities are higher than the typical players at the position that a decent user could exploit. Their OVRs are driven down because they lack position specific skills, but that's negated by usering them. For instance, lower AWR or ZCV of a LB won't really penalize you if you user them.